
by Michael Lynton and Joshua L. Steiner
So the book is written by Michael and Joshua, and Alison Papadakis, Director of Clinical Psychological Studies at Johns Hopkins, they ground their observations in relevant research and unpack the difference between failures and mistakes, the stages of mistakes, and how it's possible to break the patterns that lead to misunderstandings and shame.
They rooted their story on the authors own critical mistakes in life, and several well known and big personalities. To make their points.
The book made a good point when it said: there are many books that focus on failure, rather than mistake. Mistakes are seen as shame, when it shouldn't be. Same as failures, mistakes can make people a better one.
They frame all the mistakes look like. The impacts that happen, the consequence of that mistakes. And the big negative feelings people have around mistakes.
And they stretch readers' sense of Schema. Schema is the deeper, underlying pattern or mental template—often formed early in childhood—that drives our perceptions, behaviors, and choices, frequently leading to recurring mistakes. It is tool to analyse why mistakes happen, and it can be different amongst people.
They also then introduce DUET, on how we should response to mistakes:
They also helped with the way how to make fewer mistakes when you already know your schema:
1. Take a Deep Breath
2. Balance Instinct and Deliberation
3. Focus on What Not to Do
4. Approach Slip-ups with Curiosity, Not Judgment
Overall, I agree on schema is good to know, to make us forgiving and kinder to ourself. But it is not necessary make us unaccountable for the mistake we have. We still need to own the mistakes, know our schema, and commit to make fewer mistakes moving forward. I think thats the point, from the mistakes we then can learn how to be better each and everyday. People can certainly change, we have neuroplasticity in our side, so when we genuinely try to be better everyday, we certainly can change and be that better person.
I like when a book tries to approach the daily phenomenon with the scientific approach.
I like the frameworks of Schema and DUET to unpack why certain things happen.
I think the people they included in the book are big personality and well known people, that is intentional in a way. Because, those people make mistakes too. And the impacts can be big and the shames must be very immense because they known by lots of people. Hence more shame, more pressure.
I think it genuinely helps investigate with the why people make mistake, and how to make fewer mistake.
"They are just events, they are not your core identity"
"If someone make a mistake you need to see closely why, and investigate what make certain pattern happens. There might where the rootcause lies. "
"We want to apply what in Japanese called Kintsugi: It treats breakage and repair as part of the history of an object rather than something to disguise. It embodies wabi-sabi (the Japanese acceptance of transience and imperfection)"